|
Protesting the National
Animal Identification System (NAIS)
Quote: "Not since
Prohibition has any government agency attempted to enshrine in law a system,
which so thoroughly stigmatizes and burdens common, everyday behavior and is so
certain to meet with huge resistance from the citizens it unjustly targets." This
quote comes from an article entitled "Animal ID Makers in Hog Heaven" by
Mary Zanoni, Ph.D. (Cornell), J.D. (Yale), the Executive Director of Farm
for Life™
The full article can be viewed at
http://reliableanswers.com/politics/nais.asp
So, exactly what is the NAIS?
NAIS is a Violation of our Constitutional
Rights! A good description below is
taken from a website organized by Walter Jeffries, a small homesteader with a
big heart and a loud voice, who aims to protect American homesteaders from this
blatant violation of our constitutional rights by the USDA and corporate
producers. His website is located at:
http://nonais.org/
What is NAIS?
The National Animal ID program was originally
designed to give the big beef producers help in getting export markets which
required disease controls. The idea is that every single livestock animal in
the United States will be identified and tagged. All livestock animal
movements will be tracked, logged and reported to the government. The benefit
is to the big factory farms who probably do need this type of regulation. They
get to do single ID’s for large groups of animals. Small farmers, pet owners
and homesteaders will have to tag and track every single animal.
There are no exceptions - even small farms
that sell direct to local consumers will be required to pay the fees and file
all the paper work on all their animals. Even horse, llama and other pet
owners will be required to participate in NAIS. Homesteaders who raise their
own meat and grandma with her one egg hen will also have to register their
homes as ‘farm premises’ and obtain a Premise ID, tag all their animals and
submit all the paperwork and fees. Absurd? Yes - There are no exceptions under
the current NAIS plan. The USDA has slipped this plan in the back door without
any legislation. This is going to be very expensive and guess who is going to
pay for it in higher food prices… You!
NAIS will help some big corporations, like the big
beef producers, by opening up export markets for them to other countries.
NAIS will hurt a lot of different people including
consumers, pet owners, children, homesteaders and small farmers.
Consumers will face higher meat prices
under NAIS because the cost of producing meat will go up with the addition of
fees to the government to support the NAIS program. The cost of other foods,
like vegetables, will likely also go up as well since the manure from meat
animals is used to fertilize the soil to grow better crops. Most importantly,
NAIS will result in many small farms going out of business. The consolidation
of the meat industry into fewer, big, agri-biz producers means they will have
more control of the market and be able to charge higher prices for the same
product.
Pet owners will be forced to register
their family horse, pet sheep, llamas and other ‘livestock’ that aren’t part
of the food chain. This will cost them money and be a hassle with paperwork
and premise ID fees each year. Furthermore, every time you want to take your
pet to the vet, on a trail ride or even just cross the road you’ll have to
submit paperwork with the government and probably pay a fee. Every time. In
time, they plan to do the same for pet dogs and cats. See
PAWS legislation and
the Vermont Pet
Merchant bill that requires you to register as a pet dealer if your cat
has kittens or your dog has puppies.
Children who are in 4-H or
Future Farmers of America will have to register their parents house as a
farm and get a Premise ID as well as paying the annual fees and doing paper
work every time an animal is bought, sold, shown or moved. This will also
stifle county fairs which are already on fragile footing. Figure you’ll
not be seeing livestock at fairs of the future - there will just be the midway
and amusement rides that are poorly inspected, but no animals.
Homesteaders, people who grow some of
their own food, will have to register with the government as a farm and obtain
a Premise ID. They’ll also have to pay the annual fees associated with that
and fill out the paperwork on all of their livestock. Every time you have
chicks, goats, piglets or other animals born you’ll need to register it with
the government. Every time an animal dies you’ll have to register it with the
government. Got a predator problem? Expect to fill out a lot of
paperwork. Have an animal escape the fence and cross the road or go onto a
neighbor’s property? Fill out more forms and the neighbor may have to fill out
forms, too. Animals come on to your property uninvited? More forms. And no,
there are no exceptions. Every livestock animal must be registered, tagged and
tracked from birth to death.
Small Farmers who sell direct to their
customers will be devastated. Small farmers already work at higher costs than
the big factory farms. Under NAIS they’ll have to identify each and every
animal at a high cost because they can’t use the group identification
techniques of the big Agri-Biz corporations. The big guys do all-in/all-out
animal management. Each mass group of animals are of one gene stock and the
same age. The factory farms need only apply for one ID to cover the entire
group of thousands of animals. Small, traditional-style farmers have many,
genetically diverse animals of different ages on their farms. Each individual
animal will be required to have an ID. The result is that the cost of farming
will go up greatly for small farmers. This is likely to be the final nail in
the coffin of small farming. Developers will be over joyed as they buy up farm
land at rock bottom prices to divide up into condos and strip malls. Rural
America will turn dingy with pavement. Gone will be the fields, pastures and
meadows filled with grazing livestock. Vermont can kiss it’s tourist industry
good-bye.
Sugar
Mountain Farm Customers who buy our pastured pork, pigs, piglets,
lambs and chickens will be looking at higher prices because it will cost us
more time and money to fill out all the government’s paperwork and pay their
ridiculous new fees. I would estimate that this will raise the price by $10 to
$15 per animal, possibly more since the full fee structure is not yet known.
More over, if you’re buying live animals like laying hens, lambs or piglets
then you’ll have to get a Premise ID from the government for your home, pay
the annual Premise ID fee and do any paperwork for each and every livestock
animal you have as well as paying the associated animal fees. Currently you
save money and get better meat by raising it yourself or buying our pasture
raised products. Under NAIS you’ll pay more money for the same thing without
any benefits.
Big Agri-Biz are the clear winners
under NAIS. They will get expanded export markets and legal liability
protection at minimal cost. Because small farmers will be forced out of
business due to all the additional fees and paperwork the big Agri-Biz
corporations will gain more domestic market, bigger monopolies, more market
control and higher profits. They’re salivating at the prospect. Not only that,
but it will be harder for individuals to raise their own better quality food,
it will cost them more money and they’ll face more paperwork and government
regulation.
Just what we all need - Not.
NAIS is a Violation of our Constitutional
Rights!
http://reliableanswers.com/politics/nais.asp Another quote from the
article "Animal ID Makers in Hog Heaven" by Mary Zanoni:
1. The Standards and Plan Violate Many Provisions of the Constitution.
First
Amendment Violations - Many Christians (as well as
persons of other religious beliefs) cannot comply with the Department's proposed
program because it violates their First Amendment right to free exercise. For
example, the Old Order Amish believe they are prohibited from registering their
farms or animals in the proposed program due to, inter alia, Scriptural
prohibitions.
The way of life of these devout Christians
requires them to use horses for transportation, support themselves by simple
methods of dairy farming (most ship milk to cheese producers, since their faith
prohibits the use of the technologies required for modern fluid milk
production), and raise animals for the family's own food.
The proposed NAIS would place the Amish and other
people of faith in an untenable position of violating one or another requirement
of their most important beliefs. Further, it is not unlikely that enactment of
the NAIS as presently proposed would force the Amish and other devout people to
seek migration to another nation. It would greatly injure the status of our
country among the community of nations if the Department's actions were to
result in the forced migration of such simple, devout, and peaceful people.
Fourth Amendment Violations - The
Department proposes surveillance of every property where even a single animal of
any livestock species is kept; and to require, at a minimum, the radio-frequency
identification tagging of every animal.
(Standards, pp. 3-4, 6, 17-18.) Perhaps the Department had in
mind as its model large commercial facilities where thousands, or in many cases
tens of thousands, of animals are housed or processed. However, aside from large
livestock businesses, there are also tens of millions of individual American
citizens who own a pet horse, keep a half-dozen laying hens, or raise one steer,
pig, or lamb for their own food.
In these instances, the "premises" that the
Department plans to subject to GPS satellite surveillance (Standards,
p. 10) and distance radio-frequency reading (Standards,
p. 27) are the homes of these tens of millions of citizens. The
government is not permitted to use sense-enhancing technologies to invade the
privacy of citizens' homes.
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001). The sanctity of the
home is entitled to privacy protection in circumstances where an industrial
complex is not. See
Dow Chemical v. United States, 476 U.S. 227, 238 (1986).
Therefore, the Department should abandon its
present proposals, insofar as they entail enormously intrusive surveillance
against unsuspecting innocent citizens who have done nothing more than to own an
animal (a common form of personal property under the American system of law).
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Violations
- The proposed NAIS is the first attempt by the federal government at forced
registration in a huge, permanent federal database of individual citizens' real
property (the homes and farms where animals are kept) and personal property (the
animals themselves). (Standards,
pp. 8-13;
Plan, pp. 8, 12-13)
Indeed, the only general systems of permanent
registration of personal property in the United States are systems administered
by the individual states for two items that are highly dangerous if misused:
motor vehicles and guns. It is difficult to imagine any acceptable basis for the
Department to subject the owner of a chicken to more intrusive surveillance than
the owner of a gun.
For example, whereas the owner of a long gun
generally can take the gun and go hunting beyond the confines of his or her own
property without notifying the government, the Department proposes that the
chicken owner, under pain of unspecified "enforcement," must report within 24
hours any instance of a chicken leaving or returning to the registered property.
(Standards, pp. 13, 18-19, 21; Plan, p. 17.)
Even more important than the trammeling of basic
property rights under the program is the insult to fundamental human rights,
which must remain free from government interference.
Surely it is overreaching for the Department to
propose, as it has, the constant surveillance of one's home and animals when the
citizen is only attempting to raise food for the household or for a limited
local area, and there is no intention of distributing the food on a wider scale.
The foregoing numerous constitutional infirmities
are bound to enmesh the Department and state governments in extremely costly
litigation for years to come. Therefore, please reconsider the Department's
plans to institute a program so at odds with fundamental American values.
Is there something we can do about it?
YES, there is! You can protest. Together, We can stop NAIS by
getting loud. Politicians need to hear our voice, the roar of the common people
headed for the polls to vote them out of office this November for letting things
like NAIS happen. Our politicians have been either asleep at the switch or
actively conspiring with Big Agri-Biz to take away our freedoms.
The comment periods are still open. The USDA needs
to know, in no uncertain terms, that people are not going to stand still for
this sort of treatment. Big business should not be able to take over every
aspect of our lives and profit from everything. Individual independence and
freedom are more important to maintaining our national security than profits.
Act now. Speak up. Be heard. Spread the word.
You can sign a petition against the NAIS through
NoNAIS.org Contact your Congressmen, your Senators, your Representatives.
Contact the USDA. Don't sit and do nothing and wait. Don't think you
can make a difference? If so, you are wrong! Due to the overwhelming
response from Missouri homesteaders, The Missouri Senate recently passed the
following resolution:
SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 31
WHEREAS, Missouri's long-standing agriculture tradition
continues to thrive and contribute to our economy and to our families; and
WHEREAS, the state of Missouri has maintained a robust and
lucrative agriculture culture, frequently ranking in the top ten among states
with regard to the number of operating farms, hay, cotton, and corn production,
cattle, hog and turkey production, and more; and
WHEREAS, the economic benefits from these agricultural
operations are profoundly important to our communities, to our state, and to our
nation; and
WHEREAS the farm family is the backbone of our state, as we,
a legislative body, do swear to uphold and promote our farming community and
protect the freedoms we share; and
WHEREAS, with the introduction of the Missouri Animal ID
Program, a coordinated effort between the Missouri Department of Agriculture and
the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the issues of food security
and personal freedom became a reality for Missouri agriculture producers; and
WHEREAS, the USDA National Animal Identification System (NAIS)
is currently and should remain a voluntary program with regard to animal
identification programs and marketing practices:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the members of the Missouri
Senate, Ninety-Third General Assembly, Second Regular Session, the House of
Representatives concurring therein, hereby urge the United States Department of
Agriculture to continue the National Animal Identification System program as
a voluntary program to allow agricultural families to direct their own future;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the Missouri Senate
be instructed to prepare properly inscribed copies of this resolution for the
United States Department of Agriculture and the Missouri Department of
Agriculture.
Back to
Our Livestock Page

4/11/06
|